Holy cow! I can connect to any file area for any network my hub is carrying, how generous of them!ole.
I'm sure that's not meant to happen and would call this quite a security
Any chance of a quick fix for this?
I noticed this a while back when some of the othernet nodes started
pulling FIDO file echoes from here. With it being FIDO I didn't
think too much of it. However, some of the Othernet NCs might not
like the idea of their file echoes being carried by non-members.
I would be willing to try to assist in testing this one.
Hey Mike!
On Thu, Apr 10 2025 09:25:00 -0500, you wrote:
It was definitely an eye opener when I saw it for the first time,
too. ;)
Most other tossers work like this in some form, also. However, sbbsecho requires you to manually setup your lists, instead of matching groups (groups in HPT is the same as keys for sbbsecho) and pulling from a config file for you, like HPT does.
Accession wrote to All <=-
It was definitely an eye opener when I saw it for the first time,
too. ;)
Sorry, I just realized file distribution may not have this same feature that echomail does.. since 'tickit' is somewhat of a separate entity.
If it does, I don't know about it.
I noticed this a while back when some of the othernet nodes started pulling FIDO file echoes from here. With it being FIDO I didn't
think too much of it. However, some of the Othernet NCs might not
like the idea of their file echoes being carried by non-members.
I would be willing to try to assist in testing this one.
Most other tossers work like this in some form, also. However, sbbsecho requires you to manually setup your lists, instead of matching groups (groups in HPT is the same as keys for sbbsecho) and pulling from a config file for you, like HPT does.
It was definitely an eye opener when I saw it for the first time, too. ;)
Mike Powell wrote to ACCESSION <=-
That is for the message echoes. I don't think the *file* echoes work
that way. If they do, it is not well documented (or wasn't the last
time I checked, which has been a while).
How does HPT associate echoes with groups?
The file echos do not have this feature, and that is indeed what was
being asked about. We'd like to have "echolists" also for the file
areas (tickit/filefix).
That is for the message echoes. I don't think the *file* echoes work that way. If they do, it is not well documented (or wasn't the last time I checked, which has been a while).
Hey Gamgee!
On Fri, Apr 11 2025 00:54:58 -0500, you wrote:
The file echos do not have this feature, and that is indeed what was being asked about. We'd like to have "echolists" also for the file
areas (tickit/filefix).
Even better, there's echocfg, how about a 'filecfg' or something similar. Basically be able to setup hosting file areas the exact same way as message areas?
Even better, there's echocfg, how about a 'filecfg' or something similar.
Basically be able to setup hosting file areas the exact same way as message
areas?
I think that'd be tickitcfg.js.
Accession wrote to Gamgee <=-
The file echos do not have this feature, and that is indeed what was
being asked about. We'd like to have "echolists" also for the file
areas (tickit/filefix).
Even better, there's echocfg, how about a 'filecfg' or something
similar. Basically be able to setup hosting file areas the exact same
way as message areas?
Digital Man wrote to Accession <=-
The file echos do not have this feature, and that is indeed what was being asked about. We'd like to have "echolists" also for the file
areas (tickit/filefix).
Even better, there's echocfg, how about a 'filecfg' or something similar. Basically be able to setup hosting file areas the exact same way as message areas?
I think that'd be tickitcfg.js.
Nah, I'd pass on that to get the "FILELIST" functionality. The <..>cfg utilities are just front-ends to the config files, and not really
needed. I wouldn't even use that, as I just edit sbbsecho.ini manually anyway as it is, rather than running echocfg. Editing tickit.ini is not
difficult.
Hey Digital!
On Fri, Apr 11 2025 19:55:01 -0500, you wrote:
Even better, there's echocfg, how about a 'filecfg' or something similar.
Basically be able to setup hosting file areas the exact same way as message
areas?
I think that'd be tickitcfg.js.
Ah ok. I didn't know that was a thing.
Does that mean you eventually plan on converting echocfg to JS also?
Hey Mike!
On Thu, Apr 10 2025 09:25:00 -0500, you wrote:
> I noticed this a while back when some of the othernet nodes started
> pulling FIDO file echoes from here. With it being FIDO I didn't
> think too much of it. However, some of the Othernet NCs might not
> like the idea of their file echoes being carried by non-members.
> I would be willing to try to assist in testing this one.
If you're running Synchronet as a hub for multiple networks, you need to create separate echolists for each network. You can export them from SCFG as 'backbone.na' format (I think that's the format that just shows the echotag and description). Then in echocfg, you have to set those as your "EchoLists" with a key and the associated node number. This way, only the echolist(s) with the group/keys your link is setup for, will be shown to them.
Most other tossers work like this in some form, also. However, sbbsecho requires you to manually setup your lists, instead of matching groups (groups in HPT is the same as keys for sbbsecho) and pulling from a config file for you, like HPT does.
It was definitely an eye opener when I saw it for the first time, too. ;)
Regards,
Nick
Accession wrote to All <=-
> It was definitely an eye opener when I saw it for the first time,
> too. ;)
Ac> Sorry, I just realized file distribution may not have this same feature
Ac> that echomail does.. since 'tickit' is somewhat of a separate entity.
Ac> If it does, I don't know about it.
The file echos do not have this feature, and that is indeed what was
being asked about. We'd like to have "echolists" also for the file
areas (tickit/filefix).
Digital Man wrote to Accession <=-
> > The file echos do not have this feature, and that is indeed what was
> > being asked about. We'd like to have "echolists" also for the file
> > areas (tickit/filefix).
> Even better, there's echocfg, how about a 'filecfg' or something similar.
> Basically be able to setup hosting file areas the exact same way as message
> areas?
DM> I think that'd be tickitcfg.js.
Yes, that's for editing tickit.ini, but we're hoping for a file-echo equivalent of the functionality of 'echolists' for message echos.
There are a couple of open feature requests on this... ;-)
... Gone crazy, be back later, please leave message.
--- MultiMail/Linux v0.52
� Synchronet � Palantir BBS * palantirbbs.ddns.net * Pensacola, FL
Ragnarok wrote to All <=-similar.
El 12/4/25 a las 00:52, Gamgee (VERT/PALANTIR) escribi}|:
Digital Man wrote to Accession <=-
> > The file echos do not have this feature, and that is indeed what was
> > being asked about. We'd like to have "echolists" also for the file
> > areas (tickit/filefix).
> Even better, there's echocfg, how about a 'filecfg' or something
> Basically be able to setup hosting file areas the exact same way asmessag
e
> areas?
DM> I think that'd be tickitcfg.js.
Yes, that's for editing tickit.ini, but we're hoping for a file-echo equivalent of the functionality of 'echolists' for message echos.
There are a couple of open feature requests on this... ;-)
... Gone crazy, be back later, please leave message.
--- MultiMail/Linux v0.52
n.' Synchronet n.' Palantir BBS * palantirbbs.ddns.net * Pensacola, FL
I put some ideas at gitlab issue, i tink that is not hard to implement with little mods of the code
https://gitlab.synchro.net/main/sbbs/-/issues/831
Sysop: | Danilo |
---|---|
Location: | Keeling, VA |
Users: | 1 |
Nodes: | 20 (0 / 20) |
Uptime: | 100:39:54 |
Calls: | 9 |
Calls today: | 9 |
Messages: | 2,894 |
Posted today: | 23 |